Make Out City

princessfuckingprivilege:

little-missandry:

princessfuckingprivilege:

little-missandry:

legion-of-leijon:

Being a nice guy and being a “nice guy”: Know the difference.

There is LITERALLY no difference.

Women don’t owe you shit. We are not sex objects. Too bad if you’re sad about it. You don’t deserve anybody. You are not entitled to another human being.

That’s just how it works.

HOLY SHIT WHAT

IT’S PERFECTLY NATURAL TO BE SAD WHEN SOMEONE YOU’RE INTERESTED IN DOESN’T WANT TO BE WITH YOU

Jesus fucking Christ that’s not entitlement, that’s totally normal disappointment. 

There’s a difference between the first and second pictures and if you can’t see it then holy fuck, I’m sorry about your failing vision. 

Oh sweetie, if it were only that simple.

The implications of your so-called “disappointment” are so profoundly misogynist. Maybe you don’t even realize it. I suggest actually going to school, or reading it up on the internet. Getting out of your basement is the first step to ceasing the neckbeard lifestyle.

You are not entitled to the body of a woman.

You are not entitled to the body of a woman.

Fuck off,

Cheers!

Uh, no, cupcake, it’s natural to feel disappointed when something doesn’t go your way. Women feel that way when their love in unrequited, too. It’s not misogynistic. It’s. Normal. 

Are you assuming I’m a man? The neckbeard comments are making me wonder if maybe the ‘princess’ in my URL isn’t gender specific enough. 

Nobody’s entitled to the body of anybody. If you like someone as more than a friend, you don’t feel fucking entitled. You want to pursue a relationship with someone and that wanting has a way of encompassing your entire being and when you find out that they don’t want you back, yes, it can have a way of completely shattering you. This. Is not. A gender-specific issue. 

You’re allowed to be sad over somebody not wanting you. 

I just wanted to reblog this because it is kind of a crux of some writing elements I want to explore. I don’t care if someone reads what I write and wants to respond that I’m being offensive or something, feel free but this is like a bookmark on my blog for my future reference. It’s public because it’s not not public

First, I will write everything that comes to mind as far as “issues” with this discussion

1) sexiness (physical body, desirable, “inability” to change physical experience, dimension shifting arguments, science fiction  - the guy in the first picture is explicably rejected because the girl does not feel a sexual attraction to him (notice I did not say physical) anyway…

2) being entitled to another human being - the topic of the best love lyrics of all time - 1)Jawbreaker “assign me to a nice girl, and she can ruin me eternally, take me to the pretty ones” etc. i.e. that love is a destiny “Offer me a million bucks, all I want’s a steady fuck” - that necessity is a crime - that the worst part of the world is that it functions properly, albeit discursively

3) the “friendzone” is a phrase that is birthed from the historicity of the sexological belief system of the woman holding the power in her parts… that she holds the keys to the kingdom, or rather the portal… and the male, can by hesitance, haste, or blatancy, destroy the balance of power, and often does in the world of men. The truth of the dance is in fact known to be held as warfare, and the fruits are not the labors.

The friendzone sounds like a subway commercial.

In conclusion, sluts are more powerful than angry dead men. And words are the only way to communicate.

 To be sad over someone not wanting you,

if that person doesn’t exist, is the worst of all.